1. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DEBORAH M. YOUNG, Natural Guardian of
CAMERON DETWILER and
BRIANA DETWILER minors, In Our Own Right
2:09-cv-05015-MSG
Philadelphia PA Plaintiffs Pro Se
PETITION IN FORMA PAUPERIS
v.
COMPLAINT
ALICE BECK DUBOW, JUDGE
PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT DIVISION CAUSE OF ACTION:
1801 Vine Street, Courtroom H,
Philadelphia, PA 19103 JUDICIAL NEGLIGENCE
In her individual capacity for causing prolonged EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT
child abuse by failing to enforce her very own CHILD ABUSE
“Standing Order For Courtroom H” Rules. CONSPIRACY COVER UP
SLANDER
Defendant
and
NATURE OF CASE:
ANGELE MARIE PARKER, CEO, and
CHEREL FERRELL, SOCIAL WORKER EMPLOYEE OFFICIAL CORRUPTION,
METHODIST SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND FRAUD AND CIVIL RIGHTS
CHILDREN (“METHODIST KINSHIP”) 18 U.S.C. § 3771
4300 Monument Road, Philadelphia, PA 19131
In their individual, and Federal Grant funded capacities JURY TRIAL IS DEMANDED
as beneficiaries of kidnap for profit and prolonged child
abuse. DAMAGES:
Defendants
and (1) RETURN OF KIDNAPPED FOR
PROFIT VICTIM PLAINTIFFS
ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, COMMISSIONER DHS
CAMERON AND BRIANA
KAREN R. REYNOLDS, SOCIAL WORKER, and
DETWILER TO NATURAL
CARLA N. GARDNER, COMMISIONER’S RESPONSE
GUARDIAN VICTIM PLAINTFF,
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF
DEBORAH M. YOUNG, and
HUMAN SERVICES (“DHS”)
1515 Arch Street, 8th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19102
(3) $400,000.00 Punitive Damages
In their individual capacities as conspirators and complicit
accessories to kidnap for profit and prolonged child abuse.
Defendants
and
MARY ANN TAYLOR
1309 Church Road,, Oreland, PA, 19075
In her individual capacity as mental and physical child
abuser, and accomplice beneficiary of kidnap for profit and
prolonged child abuse.
Defendant.
1
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

2. COMES NOW, Victim Plaintiffs in our own right, and respectfully ask the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to scrutinize the civil rights violations committed
against our family by a group of corrupt officials who abuse the Public Trust and taxpayer
supported courts and agencies to inflict capital crimes against Victim Plaintiffs which have
resulted in prolonged kidnap for profit, child abuse and personal injury of Victim Plaintiffs’ as a
U.S. Citizen Family (“U.S. Citizen Family Victim Plaintiffs”).
1. U.S. Citizen Family Victim Plaintiffs are law abiding citizens and believe as
follows:
a. The Constitution of the United States of America is the supreme law of the United
States. Empowered with the sovereign authority of the people by the framers and the consent of
the legislatures of the states, it is the source of all government powers, and also provides
important limitations on the government that protect the fundamental rights of United States
citizens.
b. Federal crime victims* have the following rights, as set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3771:
(1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused.
(2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding,
or any parole proceeding, involving the crime or of any release or escape of the accused.
(3) The right not to be excluded from any such public court proceeding, unless the
court, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim
would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at that proceeding.
(4) The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court
involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding.
(5) The reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case.
(6) The right to full and timely restitution as provided in law.
(7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay.
(8) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and
privacy.
2
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

3. Defendant
ALICE BECK DUBOW, JUDGE
PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT DIVISION, COURT ROOM H
In her individual capacity for causing prolonged child abuse by failing to enforce her very own
“Standing Order For Courtroom H” Rules.
2. Defendant Judge Alice Beck Dubow’s stamped filed September 24, 2009 Opinion
prolongs the child abuse of U.S. Family Victim Plaintiffs. See 09/24/09 Opinion attached hereto
as Exhibit A.
3. Defendant Judge Alice Beck Dubow failed to abide by her very own “Standing
Court Order for Courtroom H”. See “Standing Court Order For Courtroom H” inserted below.
4. Defendant Judge Alice Beck Dubow’s negligence in complying with her very
own “Standing Court Order for Courtroom H” is at best, judicial negligence. See Deborah
Young August 3rd Notarized Affidavit and four (4) handwritten pleas of U.S. Family Victim
Plaintiff children Cameron and Briana Detwiler addressed directly to “Judge Dubow” “Judge”
and “Mayor”, attached hereto. Exhibits A, B, C, D, and E.
5. The prolonged child abuse suffered by U.S. Family Victim Plaintiffs has been
exacerbated because Defendant Judge Alice Beck Dubow did not comply with her very own
“Standing Court Order For Courtroom H” which would have enabled Defendant Judge to
“catch” the repetitive civil rights violations inflicted upon U.S. Family Victim Plaintiffs which
resulted in the official corruption Philadelphia Family Court ordered kidnap for profit and
prolonged child abuse of U.S. Family Victim Plaintiffs, Cameron Detwiler and Briana Detwiler.
(Complete “Standing Court Order For Courtroom H” inserted below.) See Correspondence
between DHS and Methodist Kinship Defendants; Stamped File Received Courtroom H
Assessment & Treatment Alternatives Report of Forensic Evaluation Biopsychosocial
Psychosexual Evaluation of US Family Victim Plaintiffs minors Cameron Detwiler and Briana
3
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

4. Detwiler and See August 6, 2008 and September 24, 2008 Correspondence from Nefertiti C.
Jordan, Esquire to Carlin Saafir, Esquire with cc to Defendant “DHS” Karen R. Reynolds,
attached hereto as Exhibit C. See multiple pages Exhibit B and Exhibit C.
http://www.advokid.org/attorneys_faq.asp
The following questions were submitted by readers of the Advokid Quarterly newsletter. If you
would like to submit a question for our next newsletter, please send your inquiry to
rlmlaw@verizon.net.
Q: I heard that Judge Alice Beck Dubow has issued new procedures for her Courtroom, can you
tell me what they are? A: Judge Dubow issued a Standing Order concerning the minimum
expectations for lawyers and parties appearing before her in Courtroom H.
STANDING COURT ORDER FOR COURTROOM H
Below are minimum expectations for lawyers and parties appearing in Courtroom H. Failure to
abide by these rules may result in disciplinary action by the Court, including, but not limited to,
vacating appointment of counsel, recommendation of removal of counsel from the Dependency
Wheel, contempt hearings and reporting counsel to the Disciplinary Board. The Court will
interpret and administer the following rules to promote justice and fairness in the court
proceedings.
A. OBLIGATIONS OF COUNSEL FOR ALL HEARINGS
1. All counsel must abide by the Rules of Professional Responsibility, the Pennsylvania
Code of Civility as adopted by the Pennsylvania Bar Association and the Principles of
Professional as adopted by the Philadelphia Bar Association.
2. If counsel is unavailable for a court hearing, the Pre-Hearing Conference or the Pre-Trial
Conference, counsel must retain substitute counsel to represent the client. Counsel must apprise
substitute counsel of the details of the case. Notifying the court administration or the court crier
that counsel is unavailable for a hearing or in another courtroom does not relieve counsel of this
obligation.
3. Failure to appear at a court hearing, the Pre-Hearing Conference, or Pre-Trial
Conference, or to retain well informed substitute counsel shall result in further discipline by the
Court, including, but not limited to, vacating counsel’s appointment, marking counsel unexcused
and recommendation to remove counsel from the Dependency Wheel. Under no circumstances
will the Court approve a payment voucher when counsel fails to appear and obtain substitute
counsel.
4. Counsel must confer with and advise clients prior to and after every hearing. If counsel
does not know the whereabouts of his client, counsel must, at a minimum, make reasonable efforts
to establish contact with his client. Reasonable efforts include, but are not limited, obtaining the
last known address from the Department of Human Services.
5. Counsel must provide other counsel with all documents that the counsel intends to
introduce into evidence at a hearing at least one day before the scheduled hearing. If a party, due
to limited finances, is unable to afford to make copies of documents before the court hearing, the
documents may be exchanged as soon as reasonably possible. In such cases, counsel shall not wait
until the hearing begins to make copies and exchange documents.
6. When the court orders that a professional prepare a report, counsel for the party
responsible for obtaining the report shall provide copies of the report to (1) all other counsel as
soon as the professional prepares the report and (2) to the Court within one day of the court
hearing.
4
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

5. 7. It shall be the responsibility of counsel for an incarcerated party, and not the Court, to
make arrangements for the incarcerated party to attend a hearing by telephone. If the incarcerated
party is only available during a particular time frame, counsel for the incarcerated party shall
notify the Court in writing the day before the hearing, and the Court will attempt to adjust its
schedule to permit the incarcerated party to attend by telephone.
8. If an incarcerated party wants to attend a hearing in person, counsel must request leave of
court in writing in sufficient time prior to the court hearing. The Court will not automatically grant
a continuance based upon the failure of the incarcerated party to be brought to Court or to be
available by telephone.
9. Counsel shall provide the Court with a courtesy copy of any motion at the time filed or
within five days of the hearing, whichever is earlier.
10. Counsel requesting an early relist must provide a courtesy copy of the Request for an
Early Relist to the Court at the time of the request.
B. OBLIGATIONS OF COUNSEL, PARTIES AND WITNESSES
1. Parties, counsel and witnesses must respect the need to limit unnecessary distractions
during a hearing and must make every effort possible to avoid entering or exiting Courtroom H
during a hearing in which they are not involved.
2. All parties must be properly attired. Among the types of clothing NOT permitted in the
courtroom are hats, sunglasses, clothing with offensive statements or symbols and clothing that
reveal underwear, cleavage or a person’s midriff.
3. All cell phones must be turned off or on vibrate mode.
4. Eating, drinking and chewing gum or tobacco are prohibited in the courtroom and the
courthouse.
C. OBLIGATIONS OF DHS
1. DHS shall report to the Court and all counsel if a child is subject to a restrictive
procedure as defined by the Pennsylvania Code within ten days of the date that DHS obtains the
information.
2. DHS shall include all counsel in its scheduling of all FSP and Discharge Planning
meetings and all parties shall agree to a specific date and time.
3. DHS shall provide a current school attendance record at every hearing.
D. OBLIGATIONS FOR PROTRACTED HEARINGS
If there is a conflict between this section and Section A, this section shall take precedence.
1. All parties are to exchange documents and lists of witnesses at least ten days before the
hearing. If the parties do not exchange the documents and witness lists, the Court may preclude
the introduction of the documents into evidence or the testimony of the witness.
2. Counsel shall stipulate to as many uncontested facts as necessary prior to the hearing.
3. Upon scheduling of the hearing, all counsel are deemed to be attached for the hearing.
Failure to appear or appearing late at the hearing will result in disciplinary action by the Court,
including the Court’s scheduling a contempt hearing, recommendation of removal from the
Dependency Wheel, report to the Disciplinary Board of Pennsylvania or other action the Court
deems appropriate. The Court will not automatically grant continuance based upon a counsel’s or
a party’s failure to appear.
4. All Motions for Continuance of a protracted hearing must be in writing and must include
the reasons for the request and the positions of the other parties.
5. All Motions for Continuance must be received in the Court’s chambers no later than
fourteen days before the hearing. The Court will only grant a continuance upon a showing of
good cause and that the delay was beyond the control of the party, its agents or his counsel. If the
Court grants the request, the Court will reschedule the hearing for the morning list if all counsel
are available and the hearing will be a status hearing.
5
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

6. 6. Any Motion for a Continuance filed within the fourteen day period will only be granted
in extraordinary circumstances.
5. Defendant Judge Alice Beck Dubow’s September 24, 2009 Opinion is
unqualified, non-applicable and is judicial culpability for kidnap for profit crimes, prolonged
child abuse crimes inflicted by way of Philadelphia Family Court Order against U.S. Family
Victim Plaintiffs, Deborah M. Young, Cameron Detwiler and Briana Detwiler. See July 13,
2009 Records Request of Victim Plaintiff Deborah M. Young, inserted below.
From: deb d <justiceforfamilies@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:22 PM
Subject: letter requesting other copies READ
To: justiceforfamilies@gmail.com
July 13, 2009
BARBARA ASH
DEPARTMENT O HUMAN SERVICES
1515 ARCH ST
PHILADELPHIA PA
Dear Ms. Ash,
Pursuant to the state open records law, Pa. Stat. Ann. tit. 65, sec. 66.1 to 66.9, I write to request access to
and a copy of Requesting documents for Cameron and Briana Detwiler's therapist reports from Tree of Life
for the period of 6-2007 until 7-2009, all report cards to date, home inspection of Deborah Young's
residency dated 5-2009. Documents from child advocate Carlin Safiir with regards to my children and
suggestions, documents regarding reasons for denied unsupervised visits.. If your agency does not maintain
these public records, please let me know who does and include the proper custodian’s name and address.
I agree to pay any reasonable copying and postage fees of not more than $0. If the cost would be greater
than this amount, please notify me. Please provide a receipt indicating the charges for each document. As
required by the open records law, I would request your response within ten (10) business days. If you
choose to deny this request, please provide a written explanation for the denial including a reference to the
specific statutory exemption(s) upon which you rely. Also, please provide all segregable portions of
otherwise exempt material. Please be advised that I am prepared to pursue whatever legal remedy
necessary to obtain access to the requested records. I would note that willful violation of the open records
law can result in a fine of up to $300 and the award of court costs and attorney fees. Pa. Stat. Ann. tit. 65,
sec. 66.4-1; 66.5. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Deborah M Young
6. Had Defendant Judge Alice Beck Dubow observed her very own “Standing Court
Order for Courtroom H”, she would have learned about the repetitive and flagrant denial of due
process, disclosure and discovery which had been inflicted upon U.S. Victim Family Plaintiffs
by official corruption, Family Court ordered kidnap for profit, DHS social worker employee
misconduct and paid contractor “Methodist Kinship.” See Deborah Young speaking on CPS
6
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

7. laws and Financial Incentives for DHS Social Workers and Family Court attorneys to falsify
evidence and deny due process to Kidnap Children for Profit, at Washington, D.C. Capitol
Building July 14 through July 17, 2009. Also See Philadelphia Police Reports, Violated
Protection Orders, Stalking of Victim Plaintiff Deborah Young and Assault of Victim
Plaintiff minor Briana Detwiler inflicted repeatedly and ignored by DHS Social Workers in
favor of the financially incented decision to give kids to demonstrated abusive father,
Vincent Lang and sexually and mentally abusive Paternal Grandmother, Mary Ann Taylor
in favor of financial gain for Social Workers employees of DHS service contract provider
“Methodist Kinship, attached hereto. See multiple pages Exhibit B and Exhibit C.
Debra Young (PA) - Justice For Families - Part 1 of 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0N39yH4jNnQ
Debra Young (PA) - Justice For Families - Part 2 of 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEmR0W2uin0&feature=related
7. U.S. Victim Family Plaintiff has tirelessly sought every lawful remedy to seek
redress for the crimes committed against her by financially incented or incompetent Family
Court positioned criminals having titles of Esquire, Custody Master, and Judge, including
starting and managing without any salary, a community enhancing grassroots, Justice For
Families, which helps other U.S. Family Victims of the systematic unchallenged corruption
which is now proven to be rampant in First Judicial District, Philadelphia County, Family Court
and affiliations, DHS, and “Methodist Kinship.” See June 6, 2009 Letter from Victim Plaintiff
Deborah Young to Honorable Arlen Spector attached hereto as Exhibit E and See US Family
Victim Plaintiff Deborah Young’s June 13, 2009 Letter to Pennsylvania Governor. See multiple
pages Exhibit B and Exhibit C.
From: PA Governor's Office <GovernorsOffice2@state.pa.us>
Date: Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:19 PM
7
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

8. Subject: RE: Pennsylvania Web Server Email
To: "justiceforfamilies@gmail.com" <justiceforfamilies@gmail.com>
Thank you for taking the time to contact the Governor's Office. Your correspondence has been forwarded
to the appropriate staff person for their review and consideration. You should expect to receive a response
in the near future. We appreciate you taking the time to bring this issue to the Governor's attention. Should
you need further assistance on an issue related to Pennsylvania state government, please do not hesitate to
contact our office again. Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: justiceforfamilies@gmail.com [mailto:justiceforfamilies@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 3:11 PM
To: PA Governor's Office
Subject: Pennsylvania Web Server Email
DEBORAH YOUNG
justiceforfamilies@gmail.com
I am sending this email to request your assistance with our DHS fight. My children got taken away from
the mother that raised them God's way and did everything a mother is supposed to do love and protect a
them. DHS has given my kids to the very man who tried to strangle my daughter and beat my son on a
visit to his house. First DHS gave them to his mother who walked out on her son and was also abusive on
visits to my children. When I found out I stopped all their visits went everywhere for help Police child
abuse services and a child therapist. SUV founded what he did to my daughter but this man keeps getting
away with all abuse. DHS told me in 2006 when he strangled my daughter and beat my son that the abuse
was unfounded they never investigated the father , if they did they would have seen his arrest record of
terrorists threats towards my children and I his stalking arrest DHS said then that I had no choice but to
take them to his scheduled visits I was mortified and went to all services to stop this NO ONE HELPED me
to help my children . I took them back there and he went after my daughter AGAIN in front of me I jumped
in front of her to protect her and he attacked me he was arrested the police saw this but after a year of
courts he walked out free again. When I stopped their visits they started making calls to DHS and accusing
me of things I didn't do instead of DHS investigating properly I am taken to court and lose my children and
have no idea why. Not one person ever spoke to my family friends pastor about me. My children told DHS
and their therapist what they (father and mother) did but DHS called my children and I liars. I was
mortified not even the judge let me defend myself. Even though I have evidence supporting what they have
done to my kids. I was accused of things I never did if there was a proper investigation then the truth would
have been revealed. I was never given the chance to defend myself or speak that is a violation of my
constitutional and civil rights. Since these people have ha! d my children they have abused them and
neglected them by leaving them alone once last year the father left my 10 yr old alone at a amusement park
while he went on a ride and when he returned a strange man was talking to my daughter. Thank God he
was not a child rapist. When we went to our first court hearing this man failed 3 drug test but got
unsupervised visits I passed got nothing and since have passed all their evaluations and test but Not the
father. Recent court DHS gave him custody. HOW? DHS is supposed to reunify with parents they have
never tried to reunify my children with me the mother. Ds has made so many false accusations of me it’s
horrible that they do this to good parents. I have passed all test in 2 years and I still have supervised visits
and still have no idea why this has happened. This is happening to thousands of families. Our children are
taken for money. Here in Philadelphia DHS gets 600 to 900 million dollars a year to destroy families many
for false accusations. I am asking you help my children before they get hurt again. I love my kids and have
never ever hurt them in anyway. I raised them they way of God and because of that I lose them. What kind
of world do we live in when DHS can get kids for lying and profit. My children have not been able to see
anyone in my family. My mother had 4 brain tumors a few months back I begged DHS to let my mother
see her Grand kids before she went in to surgery' she could have died. Thank god she didn't they called me
3 days later. My mother has seen them once in 2 yrs and they stopped her visits because at dinner we said
prays and she begged God to bring her grandchildren home and prayed for their safety. So her visits were
canceled. I am writing letters now to all senators ,governor, congress in hopes that we parents can save our
children before they become a statistic. I asking for your help. I am a Philadelphia Guardian Angel and
have been awarded from the Vice president a few yrs ago for my volunteer work that I continuously do in
8
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

9. the community. Please help me help my children. I am with Justice for Families and am asking for your
help to bring my children home where they belong. I will be going to DC have been asked to speak about
Children protective Services but my kids need help now. Thank You and God Bless. Deborah Young,
Philadelphia, PA 19136.
Defendants
ANGELE MARIE PARKER, CEO, and
CHEREL FERRELL, SOCIAL WORKER EMPLOYEE
METHODIST SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN (“METHODIST KINSHIP”)
4300 Monument Road, Philadelphia, PA 19131
In their individual, and Federal Grant funded capacities
as beneficiaries of kidnap for profit and prolonged child abuse.
8. Methodist Kinship is a Federal Grant funded business who receives money for
transactions of human being child transfers, transport, placement and replacement. See multiple
pages Exhibit B and Exhibit C and Exhibit D.
9. Methodist Kinship is a Philadelphia Department of Human Services paid service
contractor provider. See multiple pages Exhibit B and Exhibit C and Exhibit D.
10. US Victim Family Plaintiffs are in possession of more than 100 pages of proofs
(printed email, behavioral health reports and letter correspondence) of Defendant CEO, Angele
Marie Parker’s complicit accessory culpability in failing to responsibly manage Defendant Social
Worker Employees who willfully, repeatedly violated “Methodist Kinship’s” very on policies
and mission statements to cause the kidnap for profit and prolonged child abuse of US Citizens
Victim Plaintiffs minors Cameron and Briana Detwiler. U.S. Family Victim Plaintiff Deborah
Young respectfully asks this Honorable Court for permission to submit proofs and evidence too
voluminous to include in this first filing of Complaint in U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania. See multiple pages Exhibit B and Exhibit C and Exhibit D.
9
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

10. Defendants
ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, COMMISSIONER DHS
KAREN R. REYNOLDS, SOCIAL WORKER, and
CARLA N. GARDNER, COMMISIONER’S RESPONSE
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF
HUMAN SERVICES (“DHS”)
In their individual capacities as conspirators and complicit accessories to
kidnap for profit and prolonged child abuse.
11. US Victim Family Plaintiffs are in possession of more than 100 pages of proofs
(printed email, behavioral health reports and letter correspondence) of Defendant Anne Marie
Ambrose, Commissioner DHS’ complicit accessory culpability in failing to responsibly manage
Defendant Social Worker Employees who willfully, repeatedly violated Philadelphia DHS’ very
on policies and mission statements to cause the kidnap for profit, and willful prolonged child
abuse of US Citizens Victim Plaintiffs minors Cameron and Briana Detwiler. U.S. Family
Victim Plaintiff Deborah Young respectfully asks this Honorable Court for permission to submit
proofs and evidence too voluminous to include in this first filing of Complaint in U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Social Worker Employee, Karen R. Reynolds,
Social Worker II, has inflicted malicious egregious crimes of slander, denial of due process,
verbal abuse, destruction of evidence, defiance of subpoena for records; falsifying evidence and
repeatedly willfully, deliberately prolonged the aggravated assaults, sexual and mental abuse of
US Victim Plaintiffs minors Cameron and Briana Detwiler. See multiple pages Exhibit B and
Exhibit C.
12. Although not named as a Defendant, Carla N. Gardner, DHS Commissioners
Response Office, amplified the suffering of US Victim Family Plaintiffs and is complicit
accessory to prolonged abuse of Victim Plaintiff minor children Cameron and Briana Detwiler.
Defendant DHS Commissioner Anne Marie Ambrose and complacent accessory Carla N.
10
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

11. Gardner failed to perform the management functions of their public trust, federal, state and
taxpayer paid functions, repeatedly willfully inflicting kidnap for profit and prolonged child
abuse, denial of due process, defiance of records subpoenas, destruction of evidence, slander, and
personal injury upon US Victim Family Plaintiffs. See multiple pages Exhibit B and Exhibit C.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: deb d <justiceforfamilies@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:14 PM
Subject: Abuse
To: carla.n.gardner@phila.gov
Cc: AnneMarie.Ambrose@phila.gov, luqman abdullah <labdullah63@yahoo.com>,
linda.walters@comcast.net
Good Morning,
I am reporting neglect and abuse of my children again. I have documented evidence of all the neglect
and abuse of my children since DHS has taken them from me the mother and put them with the abusers.
Now on my visit on June 21 2009 my daughter Briana Detwiler showed me her hand, she was bitten by a
dog and no one took her to hospital or to see a doctor. THAT IS NEGLECT. The sitter that the father had
watching my children is an alcoholic (not recovering one) he was not watching my children and my
daughter was attacked by a neighbor’s dog. LACK OF SUPERVISION. He put a band aid on it!! When the
father returned home he did nothing also. It looked like it needed stitches when it happened (but I am not a
physician), but when they were with me any accident or illness was immediately taken care of by their
doctor. This is the man who strangled my daughter in 2006 it was founded BY SVU he FAILED DRUG
TESTS BUT YOU GAVE HIM UNSUPERVISED VISITS now you gave this abuser and addict my
children. He did 8 visits to after work rehab and he is cured by your standards. Your reports and his
mothers reports states he had been abusing Pot for 20 years. you cannot recover after 8 visits it is an
everyday process with sponsor and meetings. My daughter and sons safety and well being are my only
concerns and always has been, now my daughter was hurt again and nothing is done. THAT IS
NEGLECT. I want my daughter taken to doctors and checked. In your own reports that I received from
subpoenaed records you stated numerous times that my children were safe with me and that all their needs
were meet, so why were they taken from me the mother. I do not received report cards because they are
getting F's but they are doing academically good by DHS reports. they were honor roll students with me the
mother. Please have my daughter taken to her doctor on Castor Ave. I want to know the results please.
Thank you. Ms. Deborah Young
From: deb d <justiceforfamilies@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: Cameron/Brianna Detwiler; Deborah Young
To: linda.walters@comcast.net, justiceforfamilies@gmail.com
Very good but there was nothing about the subpoena she was served and the records she was subpoenaed to
produce on March 26th. To my knowledge that is against the law when you violate an order that you have
been served. Thank you and I hope you are feeling better. May God bless you.
On 4/14/09, linda.walters@comcast.net <linda.walters@comcast.net> wrote:
Karen: I was not in the office today but checked my email from home. I am now aware that you sent two
letters certified mail to my client Deborah Young, despite the fact that she specifically requested that
because of her > work schedule you not do that and send correspondence through regular mail. Nothing
11
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

12. ever came regular mail. In the future, can you send notices to her regular as well as certified mail? Despite
the fact that you know her phone number, you never attempted to call her to advise her of the home visit.
But for my telephone call, she would never have known of the home visit on 4/9/09 and the deadline of
4/6/09 to confirm the appointment. What adds to my distress is the fact that your letter didn't even mention
a time as to your visit. It was not until Deb called you and I left you several messages did you advise her as
to the time. How could she possibly confirm an appointment without knowing what time? You also never
advised her that there were other concerns. Nothing in the last Order stated that she needed medical
coverage in order to have unsupervised visits or that there were any other requirements whatsoever. The
Court specifically stated that unsupervised visits could begin upon agreement of all parties. In addition, Mr.
Lang failed to bring the children last Sunday with no repercussions from your office whatsoever, knowing
that this Sunday was Easter Sunday and the Court nursery would be closed. My client will not have seen
her children for almost 3 weeks. We request make up visits immediately and that they be unsupervised.
Ms. Young has cooperated with DHS fully, has undergone every evaluation recommended, her home has
passed your safety check, yet she is still hitting road blocks from your office. I fail to see the reason why.
Can we all get on the same page to have Ms. Young reunified with her children?? Linda Walters
DEFENDANT MARY ANN TAYLOR
1309 Church Road, Oreland, PA, 19075
In her individual capacity as mental and physical child abuser, and accomplice beneficiary
of kidnap for profit and prolonged child abuse.
13. Defendant Mary Ann Taylor is known by DHS Defendants to be beneficiary of
Methodist Kinship DHS paid service provider contractor; and for having inflicted mental cruelty
and sexual assault upon US Family Victim Plaintiffs children, including inflicting verbal
violence and assaulting Briana Detwiler vaginally claiming to be performing Defendant Mary
Ann Taylor’s examination as to whether Victim Plaintiff Briana is still a virgin.
14. Defendant Mary Ann Taylor is the Mother of the long term physical and mental
abuser of Vincent Lang who DHS Defendants Ann Marie Ambrose, Carla N. Gardner and Karen
R. Reynolds, acted with premeditation, negligence and malice to cause Victim Plaintiff children
Cameron and Brian Detwiler to be in full custody of resulting prolonged aggravated assaults,
mental cruelty and child abuse suffered by US Family Victim Plaintiffs minors Cameron
Detwiler and Briana Detwiler. See multiple pages Exhibit B and Exhibit C.
15. DHS Defendants allowed gross and flagrant conflict of interest witness testimony
presented by Defendant Mary Ann Taylor’s sister who was also a retired DHS social worker to
commit conspiracy, willful reckless child endangerment and doom Victim Plaintiffs minors
12
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

13. Cameron and Briana Detwiler to the prolonged suffering US Family Victim Plaintiffs, Deborah
M. Young, Cameron Detwiler and Brian Detwiler are experiencing without hope for ethical
redress. See multiple pages Exhibit B and Exhibit C.
WHEREFORE, US Family Victim Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Honorable US District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, to protect Victim Plaintiffs from further
victimizations of the officially corrupt Family Court, DHS and Methodist Kinship positioned
Defendants and make right what is wrong (redress) by ordering the return of kidnapped for profit
Victim Plaintiff minors Cameron Detwiler and Briana Detwiler to their Protector Natural
Guardian mother Deborah Detwiler immediately. Exhibits A, B, C, D and E are multiple pages
and prove conspiracy, judicial negligence, willful and prolonged child abuse, kidnap for profit,
fraud and civil rights crimes of Defendants named herein. Exhibits are appended to this
Complaint after signature line for this Court’s discretion in service of same. Exhibits A, B, C, D
and E are multiple pages, scanned and resized to fit four per page in the interest of condensing
the number of pages of this Complaint, Pages 14 through 22. Full sized Exhibit Proof
Documents will be promptly provided upon request.
Respectfully submitted
DEBORAH M. YOUNG, Natural Guardian of
CAMERON DETWILER and
BRIANA DETWILER minors, In Our Own Right
By:_____________________________________
November ____, 2009
13
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

14. Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.
14
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

15. 15
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

16. 16
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

17. 17
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

18. 18
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

19. 19
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

20. 20
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

21. Exhibit D Page 1 of 2
Select an Adoption Agency by its First Letter
Name Methodist Services for Children & Families
Address 4300 Monument Road, Philadelphia, PA 19131
Phone (215) 877-1925
Web Site www.methodistservices.org
Agency Type Adoption, Foster Care
Service Provided Family Foster Care, FFC/Medical, Caretaker/Kinship Care
Business Entity Filing History
Date: 10/21/2009 (Select the link above to view the
Business Entity's Filing History)
Business Name History
Name Name Type
METHODIST SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND
Current Name
FAMILIES
Non-Profit (Non Stock) - Domestic - Information
Entity Number: 2576986
Status: Active
Entity Creation Date: 4/20/1994
State of Business.: PA
Registered Office Address: 4300 MONUMENT RD
PHILADELPHIA PA 19131-1690
Mailing Address: No Address
Events Calendar | Newsletter | Donations | Job Openings | About Us | Contact Us | Board of Directors | Home
Caring for Children and families
Methodist Home for Children in Philadelphia was founded in 1879 by women of faith to care for
orphaned children. Today, 127 years later, the orphanage has been long closed but the building is still
being used for various community outreach and activities. The historic Main Building is the site for the
Before and After School programs, Summer Camp and an emergency Foster Care Respite apartment.
21
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.

22. Black Women in Sport Foundation maintains a presence on the ground floor in a collaboration in which
they offer alternative sports activities for the children enrolled in programs. Reaching out to children,
individuals and families is still at the heart of our mission. John Wesley’s values are the basis of our
guiding principles.
Wesleyan Values Guiding Principles
To recognize people are worthy as God's Creation. To nurture the capacity to love.
To acknowledge the potential for individual growth. To empower people to take responsibility.
To recognize human limits. To serve the poor and the children.
Methodist Services for Children and Families (Philadelphia, PA)
Contact Organization: Methodist Services for Children and Families
Address: Philadelphia, PA 19131 United States Web: www.methodistservices.org
Background Year established: 2001
Mission: The mission of Methodist Services for Children and Families is to provide prevention and
education services for children, youth and families to enable them to have the basic essentials for living
and the social, emotional, psychological, educational, and spiritual development to achieve their
greatest potential. History: The Methodist Episcopal Orphanage in Philadelphia, now known as the
Methodist Home for Children arose from the sensitivity of women in Philadelphia to the needs of
children orphaned as a result of the Civil War. The first home opened in September 1879 from the
generosity of Mr. Richard Dobbins at 2104 Park Avenue in Philadelphia. Mr. Dobbins gave temporary use
of his house to the orphanage. All aspects of operating the orphanage were conducted by women
volunteers and supported by a Board of Advisors who helped manage financial and fundraising
activities. Fundraising efforts were continuous and city-wide. Soon the orphanage was able to expand to
two additional locations. The final and permanent location at 4300 Monument Road was a generous gift
from Col. Joseph Bennett in 1882. During the 1950?s the name changed to the Methodist Home for
Children. Further changes in the social and economic conditions of the city set the stage for a dramatic
shift in the operations of the orphanage. The organization evolved from being a volunteer operated
charity to one utilizing paid professional social worker staff. With the decrease in applications to the
orphanage, a greater need was being felt to provide support for children in the community. Planning
and advocating for children today includes an intensive effort to care for children and individuals in their
own community. Specialized programs have been developed to support outreach to the community
through a number of services and nonprofit coronations under the umbrella of Methodist Home for
Children. One of those corporations, Methodist Services for Children and Families, impacts pervasive
societal issues stemming from poverty, such as substandard education, family disintegration, and the
inadequate availability of resources. MSCF confronts these issues by: providing a continuum of care
through a rang e of services designed to strengthen a family unit, advocate for equal access to
resources, increase education and training for staff and clientele and build collaborative relationships
within each of the communities served. MSCF offers a wide range of services designed o prevent the
breakdown of the family enhanced education curriculum in support of what is offered in the public
schools and therapeutic counseling to break the cycle of abusive behavior, violence and addiction.
Executive Director / President: Angele Marie Parker, Ph.D. - President and CEO
22
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E pages 14 through 22.